AI Test Management Software
Everything behind this text is your project: requirements, documentation, defects, and the suite you already wrote. The Tesbo Context Engine reads all of it before it drafts a single case. Create a free account and point it at your own project in about two minutes.
Six sources, indexed and kept current. A generated case can only cite what the engine has actually read — so the index is the product, and generation is the last step.
Every draft is retrieved against your indexed project first.
New requirements, docs and defects are read as they change.
Trusted by QA and engineering teams at




















The model was never the problem. It answered confidently, in seconds, with a case that could have been written about any product on earth — because it had never read yours.
A model can only be as specific as what it has read. Prompting harder does not add knowledge it never had.
Six sources, indexed and kept current. Generation is the last step.
Jira and Linear stories, with acceptance criteria
How your team already writes: depth and naming
Knowledge Base docs, versioned and indexed
Product logic that lives in no ticket
Every bug filed, and what should have caught it
Conventions and review decisions your team made
No black box, and nothing to take on faith. Each generated case cites the requirement it came from, the document that set the rule, and the defect that made it worth testing. Review becomes a thirty-second read instead of a rewrite.
The link to the requirement is not a field somebody remembered to fill in. It is where the case came from.
Preconditions, data, steps and expected results in the format your suite already uses.
Nothing enters the repository unreviewed. The engine drafts; your engineer decides.
Priority set to P1 — this area has produced 3 production defects in 6 months
Create a free account and see it read your project. No credit card required.
This is the case from the section above. Every source on the left is a real input the engine reads. Turn one off and the part of the case it was holding up disappears with it.
Every approval, edit and rejection goes back into the index. Corrections become conventions. The engine learns where your bar sits, and the drafts move toward it. This is the part a chat window can never do: it forgets you the moment you close the tab.
Requirements, docs, cases and defects are read and vector-indexed as they change.
Cases are generated against retrieved context, with every source cited.
Your engineer approves, edits or rejects. Nothing lands without a decision.
The decision becomes context. The next batch starts from a higher bar.
Step 4 feeds step 1. The context your team builds stays with the project, not with whoever wrote the prompt.312 APPROVALS ABSORBED THIS CYCLE
Tesbo is a complete test management platform, not just a Test Case Management Tool. Every part of it exists to get knowledge into the engine, keep it current, or prove what came out.
Hierarchical docs and files, versioned and vector-indexed. This is where your product truth lives, and the first thing the engine reads.
Pull stories and acceptance criteria from Jira and Linear. Context arrives with the ticket instead of being re-typed into a prompt.
Nested suites, priorities and rich steps. Your existing cases are not just records, they are the style guide the engine writes against.
Bugs filed from failed runs, linked to the case that caught them. Every failure becomes an input to the next generation.
Approve, edit or reject in one place. Each decision teaches the engine your bar and nothing reaches the repository unreviewed.
Because cases are generated from requirements, the matrix fills itself. Coverage rolls up across every run without anyone maintaining links.
Pass rates, flaky-test detection and risk hotspots. Results tell the engine which context mattered and which areas keep breaking.
Point Claude, Cursor or your own agent at Tesbo and they inherit the same project context, under the same human-approval rules.
Every action by agent or human, logged in full. When an auditor asks why a case exists, the answer is one click away.
Test volume is the easy part. What a QA lead actually needs is coverage they can defend, output the team does not silently discard, and a release call backed by evidence.
Requirement-to-case traceability is a by-product of how cases are generated, not a spreadsheet somebody maintains on Fridays.
Adoption fails when the output is generic. Grounded cases arrive in your format, at your depth, and survive review.
The context lives with the project. When an engineer moves on, what they knew about the product does not leave with them.
Most teams start with a free cloud account and never think about servers again. If your policy says the data has to stay inside your own network, Tesbo also runs anywhere Docker runs, on your own Postgres — and you can move either way later without losing your work.
Yes. Create an account and the Launch plan is free forever — not a trial, no credit card, and it never expires. Upgrade to Pro only when your team outgrows it.
Create a free account, connect a project, and read the first batch of cases the Context Engine drafts from your own requirements. Free forever on Launch, no credit card, no sales call.