Tesbo for QA managers
You should not need a standup to find out whether a feature is tested. Tesbo keeps the whole suite in one versioned, traceable repository — so coverage, pass rates, and risk are things you look at, not things you collect the night before the review.
- Apache 2.0, self-hostable
- Priced per workspace, not per seat
- Read-only links for stakeholders
- 148 passed
- 9 failed
- 5 blocked
Coverage lives in four places and none of them agree
A spreadsheet, a wiki page, someone’s local folder, and the tracker. Answering a simple question means reconciling all four, and the answer is stale by the time you finish.
- No single answer to “is this release covered?”
- Reports assembled by hand the night before the review
- Automation candidates chosen by whoever shouts loudest
- No record of who approved a change to a critical case
- New joiners taking a month to find where anything lives
Test management software for QA managers, from requirement to evidence
- 1You connect
Import the requirements
Jira and Linear come across as a list you can work with, not a screenshot.
JiraLinear44 pulled - 2The suite
Map them to cases
Existing cases attach to the requirement. Anything unmapped shows as a gap.
JIRA-8126 casesJIRA-8302 casesLIN-44gap - 3You read
Open the matrix
Coverage rolls up from every run. Nothing to assemble before the review.
Coverage86%Same view next quarter
Every requirement, and what actually tests it
Yes. Import requirements from Jira or Linear, map them to cases, and the traceability matrix shows coverage rolling up across every run. That is the difference between knowing how many tests you have and knowing what they cover.
- Imported from Jira and Linear, kept in sync
- Coverage that rolls up from real runs, not a typed summary
- Gaps named before the release review, not after
Pick a requirement to see what covers it
One repository, one answer
Every case, run, and result in one system, organised the same way. Import requirements from Jira or Linear, map them to cases, and coverage rolls up into a traceability matrix — a view you open, not an exercise you run. The same view is there next quarter when someone asks again.
- Coverage by requirement, release, and priority
- Requirements pulled from Jira and Linear, mapped to real cases
- Pass rates that come from the runs, not from a typed summary
- Full history, so a regression has a paper trail
The review queue is your quality gate
Everything the agent drafts needs a human approval before it counts, and every action — by a person or an agent — lands in the audit log. That gives you a record of who accepted what, which is the part post-mortems and auditors actually ask about.
- A standard enforced at the point of review, by the people who own it
- Full audit log of every change, human or AI, with attribution
- Versioned cases, so “when did this change?” has an answer
Decide what to automate on evidence
Analytics rank candidates by how often a case runs, how often it fails, and how much of the release it touches, with flaky tests surfaced separately so you stop paying for the same false alarm. The automation backlog stops being whichever suite someone already started.
- Run frequency and failure rate per case, across releases
- Flaky-test detection, so instability is visible rather than assumed
- Risk hotspots and coverage gaps called out, not hunted for
Ship the status report instead of building it
Schedule the recurring runs, assign the testers, and let the numbers accumulate. Pass rates, trends across releases, and an AI health score are already there when the review starts — and a public read-only link shares them with people who will never log in.
- Recurring runs scheduled once, not chased every sprint
- Read-only links for stakeholders, no seat required
- Release trends and health scoring out of the box
Replace the spreadsheet, keep what is in it
That is exactly the job. Cases, runs, results, and history live in one repository with nested suites, versioning, and a review trail that a spreadsheet cannot give you. Existing sheets import as CSV or XLSX, so the move is a bulk import rather than a retyping project.
Questions QA managers ask
The same five come up in every evaluation. Answers, not positioning.
Ask us directlyCan Tesbo replace our test management spreadsheet?
That is exactly the job. Cases, runs, results, and history live in one repository with nested suites, versioning, and a review trail that a spreadsheet cannot give you. Existing sheets import as CSV or XLSX, so the move is a bulk import rather than a retyping project.
How do we keep AI-drafted cases to our standard?
Nothing is saved without a human approving it. The agent proposes; your team accepts, edits, or rejects. Your standard is enforced at the point of review, by the people who own it, and the audit log records who signed off on what.
Can I see coverage against requirements, not just test counts?
Yes. Import requirements from Jira or Linear, map them to cases, and the traceability matrix shows coverage rolling up across every run. That is the difference between knowing how many tests you have and knowing what they cover.
What does it cost to give the whole team access?
Nothing per person. The self-hosted Community edition is free forever with no seat limit, and Tesbo Cloud is priced per workspace rather than per seat — so cost never decides who gets access to the suite.
Can we self-host it for compliance reasons?
Yes. The Community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hosted from a single Docker compose file, including its database and its RAG index, so your test data and your product documentation never leave your infrastructure.
Stop assembling coverage reports by hand
Put the whole suite in one place and let the report build itself. Free forever on your own servers.