Public list prices only
Every number comes from the vendor’s public pricing page or marketplace listing. We do not use negotiated rates or quotes that other buyers cannot verify.
The 2026 buyer’s guide
Nine tools. One twenty-person team. The same twelve-month period. No negotiated rates, no invented prices, and no feature-count theatre.
Prices checked Aug 22, 2026
01 / All tools
Annual list prices for a team of twenty. Jira apps use the 25-user tier because Atlassian licenses them against your whole Jira instance rather than your test team.
| Tool | How it charges | A team of 20 | Self-host | Best at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesbo | Per workspace — $30 a month billed annually | $360 | YesFree forever, no seat limit | A flat price at any headcount, and an agent that drafts the cases for review |
| TestRail | Per user — $420 a year on Professional | $8,400 | Yes10 seats minimum, 12-month contract | Reporting across many projects, and the longest integration list |
| Qase | Per user — $35 a month annually, 5 seat minimum | $8,400 | No | Unlimited storage and the most polished modern interface |
| Xray | Per Atlassian user tier, through the Marketplace | $1,820at the 25-user tier | ConditionalOnly via Jira Data Center, which is its own licence | BDD and Cucumber inside Jira |
| Zephyr Scale | Per Atlassian user tier, through the Marketplace | $1,702.50at the 25-user tier | ConditionalOnly via Jira Data Center, which is its own licence | Keeping tests inside Jira with no second tool to learn |
| Testmo | Team blocks — $99 a month for 10, then $399 per 25 | $4,788on Business | No | Manual, automated and exploratory testing in one reporting view |
| qTest | Quoted by sales — not published | Not published | YesOn-premise offered, on a quote | Large regulated programmes, especially alongside Tricentis Tosca |
| TestLink | Free, GPL-2.0 | $0 | YesSelf-hosted only — there is no cloud version | A twenty-year track record with no vendor involved at all |
| Excel or Google Sheets | You already pay for it | $0extra | n/a | A small, stable suite with one owner — genuinely hard to beat there |
Every figure is a published list price, never a negotiated one. Tricentis does not publish qTest pricing, so that cell stays unknown rather than pretending unknown means free. Where another tool is cheaper than Tesbo, the table says so.
02 / Cost curve
Flat workspace pricing stays flat. Per-seat pricing does not. Move the team-size control to compare the same tools on the same axis.
23×At 20 people, TestRail costs $8,400 a year and Tesbo costs $360. Hire another tester and only one of those two numbers changes.
Annual list price. Same scale on every bar.
Annual cost from five to fifty people. The marker follows the slider.
Every figure is computed from the same published rate card quoted in the table below, and matches it exactly at twenty people. Xray and Zephyr Scale are not on this chart — Atlassian bills them against your Jira user count, not your QA team, so they have no honest position on this axis. qTest is not on it either, because Tricentis does not publish a price and we would rather leave a gap than invent one.
03 / How to choose
Feature checklists reward the product with the longest list. These questions remove tools that do not fit your economics, workflow, or deployment boundary.
This is the question that decides your bill, and most teams answer it too low. It is not just testers — it is the developers who need to see what failed, the product manager checking a release, the support lead chasing a bug. On a per-seat tool each of those is another licence, so teams ration access and the tests become invisible to everyone else. On a per-workspace or block-priced tool the answer costs you nothing.
A high answer rules out per-seat pricing. A low one leaves everything in play.If you are considering Xray or Zephyr Scale, this matters more than your QA headcount. Atlassian requires a Marketplace app to be licensed at the same user tier as Jira itself, so five testers inside a hundred-person Jira instance means buying a hundred seats. Below about eleven Jira users these apps are the cheapest option available. Above it, they track company growth rather than team growth.
Ten Jira users or fewer makes the Jira apps the cheapest thing on this page.If yes, the list gets short quickly. Qase and Testmo are cloud only. Xray and Zephyr Scale need Jira Data Center, which is a large licence by itself. TestRail self-hosts but wants ten seats and a year’s commitment. TestLink and Tesbo Community are both free to self-host, which is the honest reason to look at either of them.
A hard yes cuts nine tools down to four, and only two of those are free.04 / Methodology
Comparisons are only useful when the assumptions are visible. These are ours, so you can reproduce the table or disagree with it precisely.
Found a stale price? Tell usEvery number comes from the vendor’s public pricing page or marketplace listing. We do not use negotiated rates or quotes that other buyers cannot verify.
Annual cost is calculated for the same 20-person team. Jira apps use the nearest published Jira tier because they license the whole instance, not only testers.
If a vendor does not publish a price, the table says “Not published”. A missing number is not treated as zero and is never estimated.
05 / Questions
The things people ask before they pick one, answered against the same pricing model and assumptions as the table above.
Software that keeps your test cases, records every run of them, and links each test back to the requirement it covers and the bug it found. The difference from a spreadsheet is history and connection: a sheet tells you what your tests are today, and a test management tool tells you what was run, when, by whom, what passed, and what it proves.
For ten Jira users or fewer, Xray or Zephyr Scale at $100 a year. If you self-host, TestLink and Tesbo Community are both free. Above roughly eleven users on a per-seat tool, the cheapest published price is Tesbo Cloud Pro at $360 a year for the whole workspace, because it does not charge per person. TestRail and Qase both work out at $8,400 a year for a team of twenty.
TestLink and Tesbo Community are free to self-host with no seat minimum. TestRail offers self-hosting on a paid plan with at least ten seats and a twelve-month contract. qTest offers on-premise deployment on a quote. Xray and Zephyr Scale can only run on your own hardware via Jira Data Center, which is its own licence. Qase and Testmo are cloud only.
For one tester with a small, stable set of cases, yes — and switching would be wasted effort. It stops being good enough when you need three things: the history of what was run and when, a link from tests to requirements, and a record of who approved what. A spreadsheet can do none of those without somebody doing them by hand every release.
Jira tracks work, not test coverage. You can manage tests in it with an app like Xray or Zephyr Scale, which keeps everything in one place at the cost of licensing the app for your whole Jira instance. Or you can use a separate tool that links to Jira issues, which keeps your test history independent of your Jira licence. Both are reasonable; the deciding factor is usually the gap between your Jira headcount and your QA headcount.
Every figure here was read off the vendor's own pricing page, or Atlassian's own Marketplace pricing data, on 2026-08-22. Each comparison page carries its own verification date. Vendors change prices without announcing it, so if something here is out of date, tell us at [email protected] and we will fix it.
One workspace. Any team size.